Words exist in other to differ every single little thing, I heard.
To differ dad and mum, granddad and granny, apple and orange, bread and rice, milk and water.
Since I don’t speak French language, so I’m not sure whether it’s correct but they say French language doesn’t differ dog and wolf. Well, for sure they must have their scientific name though.
If “words exist to differ every single thing” was correct, they, French once didn’t have to differ those two animals because they both used to be wild.
Let me make myself abstract gradually. My name is Takuma Tsuchida. He’s Japanese, Mongoloid, homo-sapiens, animal, creature. If you make a noun extremely abstract but until a step before the end, you’d got two words, “Bhava” and “nothing”, and “Śūnyatā” includes the both in the end. Buddhist tell us so but my Buddhism study isn’t enough to understand the concept of “Śūnyatā.”
It says everyone has got each problem, theme.
But if you just name it as “problems,” the solution is also abstract, which is “to solute.”
Let you break down your problems into more concrete words. Your job, money, loneliness, your personality, how you grew up. Not enough. Break down the “loneliness.” Old, romantic mistakes, to compare to others. Not enough. Make them more concrete.
In the end, your abstract ”problems” becomes elementary particles, and they give you “concrete solutions.” Then, you divide them into A: your problem, or B: others which you are not able to influence, according to Individual psychology.
“Your Ex, you broke up with three years ago” and “the death of your family”, which both go to the box “B.” You may even throw them away. If you don’t want to you can take the “B” until you go to your grave. But you have to recognize the “B” is not changeable fact. It’s the past.
Well, I’ve got an idea. You pic “You’ll improve yourself and have a better partnership” from “Your Ex, you broke up with three years ago,” and you pic “to tell ‘I love you’ more before the death” from “the death of your family.”
In short, you put the mere fact into the “B”, and you may keep the study from the regret, in the box “A” If your mind isn’t clear enough to divide them into A or B. I’d say it’s not the time you do it yet.
It IS a tough task.
You dissect something you may not want to see into elementary particles. When you reach elementary particle level, it’d be high time to make an action because when the problem becomes that concrete, so does solution.
If you don’t want to divide your problem, you don’t have to. I know how comfortable to do nothing keeping the problem abstract.
When you get bored to keep it, you start dissecting it named just as “a problem.” And you observe it from an electron microscope, and name every single part of it.
It’s tough to keep a problem but also it’d be scary if the problem became clear and the solution got clear, too. It’s because now things become “just do it.”
But when you gaze at the elementary particle form the scope, and if you figure out the mystery of the particle, you’d rather possibly be scared than excited.
Now, would you like to peek in the scope?
I’ve been already excited that I may be excited when I look at the scope.
Fin.
Artist Takuma Tsuchida 土田拓磨 a.k.a お洒落変態会社員モデルインフルエンシャルYoutuber Artist
▶︎Youtube
https://www.youtube.com/user/takumatsuchida/featured
▶︎Instagram
—main account: TAKUMA TSUCHIDA aka 洒落変態Artist
https://www.instagram.com/takumatsuchida_artist_sculptor/
—Japanese essay blog account: 未だ熟さず aka お洒落変態ブログ
https://www.instagram.com/takumatsuchida_blog/
▶︎Japanese essay blog エッセイブログ 未だ熟さず aka お洒落変態ブログ
https://takumatsuchida.wordpress.com/
▶︎Twitter
▶︎Facebook
https://www.facebook.com/takuma.tsuchida
Takuma Tsuchida 
Leave a comment